On Fri, 9 Nov 2007, Ruben Laban wrote: > Hello list, > > No ideas on the issue stated below as of yet?
apparently not (just so you don't think you're being ignored, sometimes we don't have an answer). > What could cause entries in the IPVS table to remain in > the established (or any other) state even though there is > no traffic flowing between the CIP/VIP/RIP? neither end has closed the tcp connection? > We're using persistency by the way. Though from what I've > read, the given persistency timeout is only used once when > a new connection arrives. there are lots of problems with persistency, but it was the first method we got to work for maintaining client-realserver affinity. Another less intrusive method is the -SH scheduler. You might find it causes less problems. Joe -- Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux! _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
