Thanks for the quick respons. I will setup a monitor application. Thomas -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Graeme Fowler Gesendet: Freitag, 16. November 2007 13:43 An: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list. Betreff: Re: [lvs-users] failover problem on real server failure
Hallo On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 13:26 +0100, Glunk, Thomas wrote: > Now the problem. If one Windows 2003 Server is off, we cannot connect to the > remaining terminal server. I tried a lot with and without persitant, but > there is no difference. It looks like that lvs don´t recognize that one > server is down an redirect all new connections to the other server. Is this a > problem of the running version of lvs or maybe a setup problem? If you're not running a healthcheck framework over the top of LVS, you won't detect the failure. LVS itself only does load balancing - not system monitoring. You may want to use keepalived, ldirectord or some other consolidated application that can manage your system for you both in terms of LVS setup and server/service monitoring. Graeme _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users Sage bäurer GmbH Firmensitz: Auf der Steig 6, 78052 Villingen-Schwenningen Registergericht: Amtsgericht Freiburg i. Br., HRB 611793 Geschäftsführer: Franz Bruckmaier, Dr. Thomas Scholtis _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
