Hey Mog, Just a thought? How hard would it be to replicate the sessions across multiple servers? That way could use Layer 4 and not worry about persistence.
Sameer On Nov 23, 2007 6:56 PM, mog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all hope this doesn't come to everyone thrice, apparently lvs > mailing list doesn't like pgp signatures... > > I have only recently found out about all of your great > work, > thanks to > any and all who have worked on the project thus far. My > questions > revolve around an application I am building. It is a chat > server that > talks over udp. It is not a one packet per session protocol > unfortunately. So the current lvs way of routing for 300 > seconds or so > doesn't really work for me I am hoping there is a solution i am > missing. > Here are the two solutions I see. > So I am able to maintain state across my real servers so > I could > have > the director send all packets to all real servers, and then the > servers > would decide how to properly respond. Is there a method for > this? > My second solution would be require work for sure, have > the > director > look at the first 4 bytes of the udp packet, as that contains > all the > session information i would need, and could route to the correct > real > server or another real server if the correct real server died. > I > realize this would require work but would be beneficial to > people > needing to do things like sip or h.323 and other session based > udp > connections. > > Mog > > > > > _______________________________________________ > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] > Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users > _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
