On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Steve Wray wrote:

> I'm currently seeing the ldirectord process using 171M of RAM (as
> displayed by top).

I don;t know if this is your problem but...

I believe there was a memory leak for which Ratz provided a 
patch in about Apr this year. AFAIK, this patch is in some 
branch of ldirectord (I don't know whether it's been 
released, you could look at the release notes for the 
version you have).

Joe

-- 
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!

_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected]
Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users

Reply via email to