-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Matthew Crocker Sent: Wed 1/2/2008 1:38 PM To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list. Subject: Re: [lvs-users] LVS in an Active/Active configuration
...snip... Edge routers will see two equal cost routes via OSPF 1.2.4.1/28 via 1.2.3.6 1.2.4.1/28 via 1.2.3.6 I think you mean .7 --^ Cisco per-flow load balancing will install both routes into the router FIB and load balance inbound traffic to each director. LVS-NAT won't work because of the requirement that returning traffic has to pass through the correct director. LVS-DR would probably work fine, the real servers could then send the return traffic directly back to the routers. -Matt ------------------------------------------------------------------- FWIW, I read somewhere that in this scenario you will want to run the sync daemon as a master and a slave on both directors, so they will merge their changes. -C
<<winmail.dat>>
_______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
