On Jan 10, 2008 1:03 AM, Sameer Garg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can you please elaborate. Inactive connections AFAIK are not an issue. > If you lower the persistance value the inactive connections will be > maintained for a shorter duration. > > Sameer > > > On Jan 10, 2008 7:30 AM, Randy Paries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hello, > > just rebuilt a box. I went from fc4 to centos. Configured as close to > > the old one as possible. > > > > but i am seeing way to many InActConn > > > > Any suggestions on where to start looking? local.flanders:http is the > > new rebuilt machine > > > > # ipvsadm > > IP Virtual Server version 1.0.10 (size=65536) > > Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags > > -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn > > TCP www.unitnet.com:http wlc persistent 1800 mask 255.255.255.0 > > -> local.flanders:http Route 1 76 3592 > > -> local.smithers:http Route 1 87 156 > > -> local.lovejoy:http Route 1 119 89 > > TCP www.unitnet.com:https wlc persistent 1800 mask 255.255.255.0 > > -> local.flanders:https Route 1 0 2 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] > > Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] > Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users >
Sameer, thanks for your help. you got me down the correct path. it was KeepAlive and MaxKeepAliveRequests in my httpd.conf that fixed it _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
