On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 11:19 +0100, Andreas Altenburg wrote: > Yes, i understand. But another question: I have problems configuring > the realserver with one internal (real) IP and the VIP on the lo > interface (with the director as the gateway of the lo):
OK, step-by-step: > ifconfig eth1 192.168.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast > 192.168.0.255 up Fine. > route add -net 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 dev eth1 Fine. > ifconfig lo:0 <VIP> netmask 255.255.255.255 broadcast <VIP> up Fine. > route add -host <VIP> dev lo:0 You don't need this. If the VIP is already local, no route needs configuring. However, I don't see any errors, so I don't understand the problem. > Where is my mistake? I do not want the real server to have a public IP > in the same subnet as the VIP on eth0. My VIP is a public IP. Hope, > you will understand my problem ;-) I'm not sure I do, no. For -DR, the realserver _needs_ to have the VIP on a loopback (or other) alias or it won't be able to create response packets. Graeme _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
