On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 06:39 -0800, Joseph Mack NA3T wrote:
> isn't -m LVS-NAT?

Pah, yes it is. Cleverclogs.

I'll amend my reply accordingly. Andy, ignore everything I said, it's
all so much gibberish.

I'll get another cup of tea and ponder a more accurate response :)

Graeme


_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected]
Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users

Reply via email to