On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 06:39 -0800, Joseph Mack NA3T wrote: > isn't -m LVS-NAT?
Pah, yes it is. Cleverclogs. I'll amend my reply accordingly. Andy, ignore everything I said, it's all so much gibberish. I'll get another cup of tea and ponder a more accurate response :) Graeme _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
