Hi Folks, Has anyone configured multiple gateways on 2 NIC's. Please guide me HOW-TO.
Thanks In Advance Madan KN On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Madan KN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > *Hi,* > Now on each realserver i have 2 Nic's. (ex: 192.168.1.58/192.168.2.58) > > My directory forwards all the requests on 192.168.1.58 n/w. > I need to set the routing table on realservers that to use only director > as gateway if destination is 192.168.1.0 n/w. > For others use 192.168.2.0 n/w. > > The reason is my mysql connections take double the time if i use the > director as gateway. > > Please guide me how to go about. > > Thanks, > Madan KN > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Bgs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > There is no howto about it afaik. It's absolutely not a standard setup. > > Actually I've never seen it anywhere before, but I've been using it in > > high traffic production level environment for quite some time. We can > > use an arbitrary number of loadbalancers to distribute traffic on the > > same frontend server park. > > > > Madan KN wrote: > > > Hi, > > > Can you please refer me to Howto documentation to acheive the > > following > > > below. > > > Since am doing this for the first time, need some heads up. > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Madan KN > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Bgs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> Example (I used it a lot in production level env): connmark the > > traffic > > >> coming from you director and mark it on output. The you can use > > fwmark > > >> to set up a routing table for the director. This way you can keep > > your > > >> normal default gateway on your realservers. You can also have > > multiple > > >> directors if you want using this method. Works like a charm :) > > >> > > >> Regards > > >> Bgs > > >> > > >> > > >> Madan KN wrote: > > >>> Hi, > > >>> Thanks for reminding this, Can you please suggest me how will we > > achieve > > >>> this. > > >>> > > >>> Since all my traffic getting routed through Director. I want only > > LVS > > >> Port > > >>> 8080 being routed through > > >>> Director. > > >>> > > >>> Others using my default router hardware. > > >>> > > >>> Thanks In Advance, > > >>> Madan KN > > >>> > > >>> On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 4:46 AM, bgs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Hi, > > >>>> > > >>>> If you don't want to route all non-lvs traffic through your > > director > > >>>> (creating double traffic on you LAN and adding a spof), you can > > also > > >> mark > > >>>> the traffic and use routing rules. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> Regards > > >>>> Bgs > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 23:17:23 +0530, "Madan KN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> wrote: > > >>>>> Hi Jason/Joseph, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Thanks folks, It works :) > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Thank you again. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Madan KN > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Joseph Mack NA3T <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>>>> On Sat, 19 Apr 2008, Madan KN wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096) > > >>>>>>> Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags > > >>>>>>> -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn > > InActConn > > >>>>>>> TCP 192.168.1.10:8080 rr > > >>>>>>> -> 192.168.1.62:8080 Masq 1 0 0 > > >>>>>>> -> 192.168.1.60:8080 Masq 1 0 0 > > >>>>>>> -> 192.168.1.58:8080 Masq 1 0 0 > > >>>>>> > > >> > > http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.LVS-NAT.html#one_network > > >>>>>> Joe > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> -- > > >>>>>> Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina > > >>>>>> jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map > > >>>>>> generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml > > >>>>>> Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux! > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> _______________________________________________ > > >>>>>> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - > > >> lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org > > >>>>>> Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>>>>> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > > >>>>> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - > > lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org > > >>>>> Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>>>> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users > > >>>> _______________________________________________ > > >>>> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - > > lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org > > >>>> Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>>> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users > > >>>> > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > >>> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - > > lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org > > >>> Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users > > >>> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - > > lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org > > >> Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users > > >> > > > _______________________________________________ > > > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org > > > Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org > > Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users > > > > _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users