Hi Sylvain, Yes, we only have two machines, so that will be the case alright. We did wonder whether that would be the problem. Thank you very much for confirming it.
Regards, Bruce 2008/4/29 Sylvain Viart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Bruce, > > Bruce Thompson a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > We have two directors which are also the real servers which host two > > instances of LDAP (is it a problem for LVS to route to a local server > I think it's the same problem, citation: > > If fact member of the LVS cannot use LVS. > > > http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/mini-HOWTO/LVS-mini-HOWTO.html#gotchas > > > > To set up and test/run LVS, you need a minimum of 3 machines: client, > > > director, realserver(s). > > > > > > From the outside, the LVS functions as one machine. The client cannot > > > be one of the machines in the LVS (the director, or realserver). You > > > need an outside client. If you try to access an LVS controlled service > > > (eg http, smtp, telnet) from any of the machines in the LVS; access > > > from the director will hang, access from a realserver will connect to > > > the service locally, bypassing the LVS. > > > Is it your case? > > Does it work it you split on three physical distinct server? > > Regards, > Sylvain. > > > _______________________________________________ > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] > Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users > -- m: +64 (0)21 962 085 h: +64 (0)4 384 8740 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] skype: bjthompson _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
