On Thu, 29 May 2008, Amos Shapira wrote: > Are the two different subnets a problem at all for any LVS configuration?
read the entry in the HOWTO >> don't need this > > Is this answer correct only for LVS-NAT or is it also for LVS-DR? you don't understand what's going on, so yes or no at not answers > In the meantime I asked ThePlanet whether they can just combine the > two /28 networks into one /27 since they are consecutive (.64 and > .80), maybe that will alleviate that problem, if it is a problem at > all. it's not the problem Joe -- Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux! _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
