On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 08:25:50AM -0700, Joseph Mack NA3T wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jul 2008, Marco Lorig wrote: > >> Both "directors" are connected via GRE. The first director starts >> routing to the second one through the tunnel as soon as the realservers >> behind it aren´t available anymore. So it "turns off" the ipvsadm and >> switches itself to a routing instance. > > neat. > > How do the clients know which datacenter to route to? > >> The second director, which also serves clients and servers at its >> location by ipvsadm, starts another ipvsadm instance on the GRE >> interface and is receiving routed packets from the first director >> through GRE tunnel.
What forwarding mechanism are you using on the second director, and are any of its real-servers local (i.e. an address that belongs to the second real server). I only ask so that I can try and reproduce the problem. > I see. > > can you set mss on this interface? That does sound like a work-around worth trying to me. > ip_vs() does all sorts of things to the interface. I don't expect anyone > has tried LVS on a gre interface. [snip] -- Horms _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
