On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 04:21:41PM +0100, lists wrote: > > Solved this a while back but forgot to tell the list: > > Many thanks to Siim Põder for helping to port Carlos Lozano’s patch from > 2.4 -> 2.6 > In order to run an SSL reverse proxy on the same node that is running LVS > i.e. > > External client —> pound:443 –> Local:443 —> IPVS:80 —> RealServer > > Patch for 2.6.25 is here: > http://www.loadbalancer.org/download/patches/ip_vs_locallvs.patch > > Kernel Build with patch for Centos5.1 here: > http://www.loadbalancer.org/blog/?p=12
This really ought to get merged into the main code. Are there known side effects? Can someone (i.e. the copyright holder) provide a signoff line as per http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html ? -- Horms _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
