On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Sebastien COUPPEY wrote: > We can see that packets arrive back on the director, are correctly > rewritten and sent back to the client 10.44.0.254. However the client > never receive the packet.
I didn't look at the dump, but will take your interpretation of it. Is it possible for you to have problems with the reduced MTU of the ipsec packets. Can you fetch a small web page from the realserver, or run a service with small packets, eg telnet? If you haven't handled that already, lookup the sections in the HOWTO that have MTU in the section heading. > I was wondering if the "brownfield" patch don't know (but you only have one NIC?) > or NFCT patch don't think so > described in the LVS-HOWTO.LVS-NAT.html documentation was > included in the 2.6.18 kernel. ipvsadm v1.24 2003/06/07 > (compiled with getopt_long and IPVS v1.2.0) Joe -- Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux! _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
