Here is the change I made:
for (my $x=11; $x <= 62; $x++)
{
my ($y) = $x + 110;
#system("/sbin/ipvsadm -A -t 172.16.16.$x:443 -p 1500 -s rr");
system("/sbin/ipvsadm -A -t 172.16.16.$x:443 -p 1500 -s dh");
system("/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 172.16.16.$x:443 -r 192.168.253.$x:443 -m
-w 1");
system("/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 172.16.16.$x:443 -r 192.168.253.$y:443 -m
-w 1");
}
________________________________
From: Joseph Mack NA3T <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.
<[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 12:28:30 PM
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] load balancer IP limit?
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008, Steve Haneman wrote:
> That fixed it. I changed from rr to dh and I'm seeing all goodness. Thanks
> Jeff!
well I'm impressed. Another way of getting persistence
without invoking the -p.
It would be nice to know why the original installation
didn't work.
Joe
> Not sure if this might help but have you tried using different
> scheduling algorithms? In particular maybe destination hashing?
--
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected]
Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected]
Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
