Just curious on this, what happen if you force the weight using ipvsadm?, is the weight "reset" by ldirector?
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 10:06 PM, Robinson, Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Furthermore, the following tcpdump from the load balancer shows > ldirectord's healthceck of the RS on port 5060 and the RS answering, yet > ipvsadm still shows the RS with weight 0. Meanwhile, ipvsadm shows a > bogus RS at port 5061 with weight 1, even though no packets are ever > sent to that port! > > 18:31:26.511709 IP lb2-inside.mycharts.md.47285 > 192.168.10.200.5060: S > 2859466238:2859466238(0) win 5840 <mss 1460,sackOK,timestamp 2064340618 > 0,nop,wscale 6> > 18:31:26.511854 IP 192.168.10.200.5060 > lb2-inside.mycharts.md.47285: S > 2367511769:2367511769(0) ack 2859466239 win 5792 <mss > 1460,sackOK,timestamp 1578913689 2064340618,nop,wscale 2> > 18:31:26.511896 IP lb2-inside.mycharts.md.47285 > 192.168.10.200.5060: . > ack 1 win 92 <nop,nop,timestamp 2064340618 1578913689> > 18:31:26.512725 IP 192.168.10.200.5060 > lb2-inside.mycharts.md.47285: P > 1:66(65) ack 1 win 1448 <nop,nop,timestamp 1578913690 2064340618> > 18:31:26.512758 IP lb2-inside.mycharts.md.47285 > 192.168.10.200.5060: . > ack 66 win 92 <nop,nop,timestamp 2064340618 1578913690> > 18:31:26.513130 IP lb2-inside.mycharts.md.47285 > 192.168.10.200.5060: P > 1:255(254) ack 66 win 92 <nop,nop,timestamp 2064340619 1578913690> > 18:31:26.513348 IP 192.168.10.200.5060 > lb2-inside.mycharts.md.47285: . > ack 255 win 1716 <nop,nop,timestamp 1578913691 2064340619> > 18:31:26.513371 IP 192.168.10.200.5060 > lb2-inside.mycharts.md.47285: P > 66:86(20) ack 255 win 1716 <nop,nop,timestamp 1578913691 2064340619> > 18:31:26.513379 IP 192.168.10.200.5060 > lb2-inside.mycharts.md.47285: F > 86:86(0) ack 255 win 1716 <nop,nop,timestamp 1578913691 2064340619> > 18:31:26.513385 IP 192.168.10.200.5060 > lb2-inside.mycharts.md.47285: R > 87:87(0) ack 255 win 1716 <nop,nop,timestamp 1578913691 2064340619> > > > -- > Eric Robinson > > > > Disclaimer - November 14, 2008 > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended > solely for LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.. If you are not the > named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute, copy or alter this > email. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the > author and might not represent those of . Warning: Although has taken > reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, the > company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the > use of this email or attachments. > This disclaimer was added by Policy Patrol: http://www.policypatrol.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] > Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users > _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
