Thanks for the hint. HAProxy seems Ok for my need. Luca
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Malcolm Turnbull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It would be nice if you could do full SNAT in LVS and even better > transparent SNAT using tproxy (not sure if thats even possible at > layer 4)..... > But thats a big ask for the developers... > However Haproxy will easily fit your current requirements, have you > looked at that? > > > >> >> 1. You need to "load balance" several servers, which are on the >> network 10.3.136.x , and you have the clients *on the same network*. >> 2. You have to load balance, but you can't touch the servers to be >> "balanced". >> 3. You can't change the clients to another network. >> 4. You want to use SNAT to make the packages looks like coming from >> the balancer box, so that the servers "answer" to that server, right? >> >> If so: it doesn't work. I can think of some ways to solve it, but >> they are all complicated, and implicate an least one extra computer >> (real or virtual). I won't describe it here, because I lack the time >> (I have work to do). >> > > -- > Regards, > > Malcolm Turnbull. > > Loadbalancer.org Ltd. > Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779 > http://www.loadbalancer.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: > http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ > > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] > Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users > _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
