Joseph Mack NA3T wrote: > On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Arndt Roth wrote: > >> My questions is, if it is possible to bind each VS in ldirector to a >> particular core and to a particular NIC for optimal perfomance? > > is ldirector lvs or ldirectord? Make sure you understand the > difference. > > The short answer is no. The real question is why do you > think this would give optimal performance? It might but you > haven't explained why
Au contraire. numactl can bind a process to a specific CPU and shared memory space. I don't believe it can be used to bind a process to a specific NIC if you're using channel bonding, but feel free to read the numactl man pages. That said, from what I understand, ldirectord shouldn't *need* to be optimized (but I don't use it so ymmv). Cheers, Dan -- Dan Yocum Fermilab 630.840.6509 [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://fermigrid.fnal.gov Fermilab. Just zeros and ones. _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
