http://lists.graemef.net/pipermail/lvs-users/2008-July/021071.html
The thread linked above describes exactly the behaviour I've seen and strugged with when trying to configure LVS. In the past I've inherited badly configured systems where the fallback behaviour only worked by accident, because the sysadmins who created them didn't realise that they had apache listening on all ip addresses and not just 127.0.0.1 In my opinion, this behaviour is broken. If it's not going to be fixed, can the documentation at least be updated to match the actual behaviour? The thread implies that LVS did once behave as documented but that this changed, possibly unintentionally as a side-effect of some other feature. Is there a reason why it can't change back? I *want* to be able to run fallback services on the director because it minimises dependencies; I want to be able to run them only on localhost because that is more secure and on configurable ports for flexibility. -- Bruce What would Edward Woodward do?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [email protected] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
