Joe, I wanted to chime in on this and ask another question. I've read the article in the how to some time ago and my basic understanding is that if we leave the bucket at the default there is no real fear of loosing any connections as long as we have enough ram (as each of the buckets can have any number of connections). So is the assumption that large amounts of memory (2gb+) should be able to handle pretty much an unlimited number of connections?
________________________________ From: [email protected] on behalf of Joseph Mack NA3T Sent: Fri 3/6/2009 4:29 AM To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list. Subject: Re: [lvs-users] LVS Connection Hash Table Size On Fri, 6 Mar 2009, Graeme Fowler wrote: > On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 10:35 +0800, XUFENG wrote: >> Is there another way to tune this parameter (IPVS connection table size) >> besides recompiling the Linux kernel? read the HOWTO on changing the table size Joe -- Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux! _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [email protected] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [email protected] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
