Ignore me I didn't see the first post saying no health checker was being used.
2009/3/31 Malcolm Turnbull <[email protected]> > I've never heard of this being a problem? 1000 doesn't sound like a lot of > stale connections? > Is their some more info on this? > > I have customers doing 50K conns/second with no problems. > > > > > 2009/3/31 <[email protected]> > > -----Original Message----- >> From: "Fabio Coatti" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:08am >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [lvs-users] LVS and stale connections >> >> >say, after reboot a couple (out of five) of servers shows with ipvsadm -L >> more >> >than 1000 connections (and all of those are fake, as the Rservers have >> been >> >rebooted) and ipvs doesn't pass any new connection until the count lowers >> >enough and only 3 servers are actually working. >> >> >> We've seen this problem too; the only way I've found to clear that counter >> is to pull a server from rotation and leave it pulled for 15-30 minutes. >> >> -- >> Jason Faulkner >> Linux Systems Engineer >> Mailtrust, a division of Rackspace >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: >> http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ >> >> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] >> Send requests to [email protected] >> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users >> > > > > -- > Regards, > > Malcolm Turnbull. > > Loadbalancer.org Ltd. > Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779 > http://www.loadbalancer.org/ > -- Regards, Malcolm Turnbull. Loadbalancer.org Ltd. Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779 http://www.loadbalancer.org/ _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [email protected] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
