I would like to test the way you test to see if I can get 50k/s and 10,000,000 concurrent connection. What kind of test condition do you use, clients? server? data size?
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 3:55 AM, Malcolm Turnbull <[email protected]> wrote: > Your figures sound very low. > > We have several customers running at 10K/s+ on fairly stock 2.4 Kernel > and our newer 2.6 kernels have > also been tested at 50K/s (although it did have keepalive turned on, > we copied the published coyote point tests) > Also it was obviously with very small packets and throughput was about > 850MB/s on gigabit.. i.e. saturated. > Just had a look, and the results without keepavlive were only 14K/s: > http://www.loadbalancer.org/whyr16.html > > Willy has had HaProxy running at 10Gbs (large packets), I find it hard > to believe LVS would be slower.... > I'd be happy to send you some of our load balancers to test > performance (feel free to publish to the list.) > Where abouts are you based? > > Not sure we have ever tested for max conns, but the 50K/s test was run > for 4mins giving @10,000,000 connections. > Any results are pretty relevant as we use almost stock kernels. > > > > > > > > > > > > 2009/4/9 netadmin @dslextreme.com <[email protected]> >> >> I setup a computer has two 1GB interfaces, doing NAT mode, when sending >> traffic to it from Load Runner to the server, I saw the traffic going up and >> down between 1000 to 1500 transactions per second, not very stable. If I >> just use the same computer as router the traffic chart is much flat and get >> about 2000 transactions per second. >> >> I also tested the max concurrent connection using IXAX tester, it limited to >> about 3 million and no matter how much memory on the sytem, it will not go >> up. The new connection per second rate is also about 6k/s. >> I also noticed 2.4 kernel LVS works better than 2.6 kernel on the same >> hardware, performance wise. >> >> >From those tests, I think there are some limit in somewhere, especially the >> trsanaction rate with and without LVS having that much differences. >> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Joseph Mack NA3T <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, netadmin @dslextreme.com wrote: >> > >> > > If I want to load balance 8GB/s throughput, can LVS do it and what kind >> > of >> > > system it will take? >> > >> > any system that can handle 8GBps thoughput >> > >> > > If the concurrent connection limit is 8 million, >> > >> > the connection limit is the memory/128bytes. >> > >> > Joe >> > >> > -- >> > Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina >> > jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map >> > generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml >> > Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux! >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: >> > http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ >> > >> > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] >> > Send requests to [email protected] >> > or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: >> http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ >> >> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] >> Send requests to [email protected] >> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users > > > > -- > Regards, > > Malcolm Turnbull. > > Loadbalancer.org Ltd. > Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779 > http://www.loadbalancer.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: > http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ > > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] > Send requests to [email protected] > or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users > _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [email protected] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
