The default gateway for the target servers is 10.14.3.1. I'd prefer to use DR for performance reasons. Wading through the mini howto it looks like I need to have the VIP on the target servers as well. The problem is they are on a different subnet so I'm not sure how to make that work.
Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT [email protected] 301-600-2399/x12399 > From: Graeme Fowler <[email protected]> > Reply-To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." > <[email protected]> > Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:01:12 +0100 > To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Lvs for multi-site/subnet terminal services > > Hi Paul > > On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 08:53 -0400, Paul Dickson wrote: >> Thanks for the suggestion. Looking at the man page it it's exactly what I'm >> doing, the connection report shows. I've tried tunnel, masq, and route. >> I've created the service with and without the netmask. Any ideas? > > Yes - don't use tunnelling. You're working with Windows machines, and > tunnelling is more difficult than it needs to be. > > Do your realservers (10.14.3.133 and 10.14.3.121 in your message) use > the director as their default gateway, or not? That will dictate whether > you use NAT (masq) or DR (gate). > > Graeme > > > _______________________________________________ > Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: > http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ > > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] > Send requests to [email protected] > or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [email protected] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
