That seems to pertain to failing over a downed director, for which I am already using ip addr add.
My poor performance is taking place where the director acknowledges a down realserver. Im not sure that link had any information on this aspect, but Im still looking through it all to make sure. Thank you, -Anthony Sturchio -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joseph Mack NA3T Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 9:38 AM To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list. Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Large clusters and slow realserver checking On Thu, 24 Sep 2009, Anthony Sturchio wrote: > My company has a large number of secure web applications that we have > running on an LVS cluster. There are about 200 real IP's (for 200 different > domains / SSL certificates) and we have 5 different realservers in the mix. > Does anyone have any suggestions on how we could improve the very poor > response time to expiring downed servers? have you read how to do it for 1024 IPs? http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.failover.html#1024_fa ilover Joe -- Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux! _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [email protected] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [email protected] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
