On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, Vincent Young wrote: >>> eth0:0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr FE:FD:61:6B:82:44 >>> inet addr:192.168.134.109 Bcast:192.168.255.255 Mask: >>> 255.255.128.0 >> >> you have a /23 network? > > > This is the settings I was given to add a private ip to eth0:0
well you can telnet to it, so I guess it's OK >>> tunl0 Link encap:IPIP Tunnel HWaddr >>> inet addr:97.107.133.234 Mask:255.255.255.255 >> >> what happened to BROADCAST? it should be 97.107.133.234 >> > This is on the realhost. > I bring up the tunl0 on realhost using: > # /sbin/ifconfig tunl0 97.107.133.234 netmask 255.255.255.255 > broadcast 97.107.133.234 > it doesnt show me anything about broadcast. same thing if > i use lo:0 as well. Hmm mine doesn't either. How about that? (I wonder when that changed, or maybe it's always been that way and I've never noticed.) It looks like you've done all the right things. I assume you're going to have the same problem with LVS-DR if adding the VIP to lo:0 kills the network. I would assume there's something wrong with Xen at this stage. I don't know how many people are using virtualised servers - there's got to be a few and we aren't hearing anyone having problems. The only one so far is http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.virtualised_realservers.html#tcp_checksum_bug I'm stumped sorry. Joe > -- Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux! _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [email protected] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
