On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 02:17:01PM +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running ldirectord with > http://hg.linux-ha.org/agents/rev/6e8b562f5414 applied for better IPv6 > support. Basically, it works fine, thanks for implementing this. But I > wonder whether there's a fundamental reason for not allowing IPv4 and > IPv6 virtual services with the same fwmark, like > > virtual=1 > [...] > virtual6=1 > [...] > > which results in > > Error [21297] reading file /etc/ldirectord.cf at line 15: duplicate virtual > server > > if tried. Is this only an overzealous sanity check in ldirectord, or > are iptables and ip6tables fwmarks actually related somehow? > > Two loosely related subquestions: > > 1. Did anybody think about somehow enabling symbolic fwmarks in > virtual service declarations?
My initial reaction is that this is just an oversight. > 2. Why aren't IPv6 real server addresses resolved from DNS in the > ipvsadm -L output, just like IPv4 ones are? I am surprised that doesn't work, I suspect it is also an oversight. _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org Send requests to lvs-users-requ...@linuxvirtualserver.org or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
