Jacob, I would have thought it would be happy with all of those requirements as its pretty application agnostic. I'd recommend one-arm Direct Routing mode but NAT mode would also be transparent.
On 6 November 2013 21:09, Jacob Gibson <[email protected]> wrote: > I was happily using HAProxy, until I received word that we need to also > encrypt traffic to the web servers. So, internet --https--> load balancer > --https--> web servers. Would ldirectord be a more appropriate choice? We > don't need any Layer 7 rules. > > We do need the following: > > 1) HTTPS all the way through > 2) Web servers need to see the IP of the user > 3) Users need sticky sessions to a web server (where the sticky assignment > counter gets refreshed on each user request) > 4) HTTPS Keep-Alive support > 6) Mobile and older browser support (I say this because I keep reading this > about SNI, but I don't know if that applies to us) > > I believe ldirectord can do #1 and #2, but don't know about #3-#6. > > Thanks > _______________________________________________ > Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: > http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ > > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] > Send requests to [email protected] > or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users -- Regards, Malcolm Turnbull. Loadbalancer.org Ltd. Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779 http://www.loadbalancer.org/ _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [email protected] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
