F5 as another vendors make tuning in TCP stack, if you have some idea to compare lvs vs f5 I think it will not be very conclusively.
In case you want to compare with F5, F5 *fastL4 *Profile would be the most similar to LVS. Regards! 2016-03-24 17:35 GMT+01:00 Jamie Dahl <jam...@meatball.net>: > and to also note. the F5 use asics to accelerate a lot of L7 functionality > and ddos offload; cots cannot really compete with that. I am a fan of > putting the heavy lifting intelligence on a proxy tier behind the LB since > that allows seemless horizontal scaling. very much a fan of L4/RR/dr or > l3dr > > > > this was pounded out on my iPhone and i have fat fingers plus two left > thumbs :) > > > > On Mar 24, 2016, at 01:07, Malcolm Turnbull <malc...@loadbalancer.org> > wrote: > > > > As no one else has replied I thought I would. > > > > LVS fullNAT is not widely used but is likely to perform very well as it > is > > simple layer 4 routing. > > Most people use LVS for layer 4 dr/masq mode and HAProxy for anything > that > > needs Layer 7 i.e. a proxy (fullnat). > > > > F5 is the top of the range commercial product so neither LVS or HAProxy > are > > anything like it. However they can give 95% of the performance/features > > when configured correctly. > > Loadbalancer.org, Kemp & Barracuda Networks all use LVS for layer 4 load > > balancing in their commercial products. > > > > You are much better off looking at what your requirements are first NOT > > comparing to a random commercial product. > > > > > > > > > >> On 23 March 2016 at 12:10, wei wang <lny...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi. > >> Is there any performance test result report for lvs fullnat? I want > >> to compare it with F5 hardware load balancer,so if there are some > >> report, please send to me. thanks. > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: > >> http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ > >> > >> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org > >> Send requests to lvs-users-requ...@linuxvirtualserver.org > >> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > > > Malcolm Turnbull. > > > > Loadbalancer.org Ltd. > > Phone: +44 (0)330 380 1064 > > http://www.loadbalancer.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: > > http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ > > > > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org > > Send requests to lvs-users-requ...@linuxvirtualserver.org > > or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: > http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ > > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org > Send requests to lvs-users-requ...@linuxvirtualserver.org > or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users > -- Load balancer distribution - Open Source Project http://www.zenloadbalancer.com Distribution list (subscribe): zenloadbalancer-supp...@lists.sourceforge.net _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org Send requests to lvs-users-requ...@linuxvirtualserver.org or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
