Oh, thanks. Where I can find out the full procedure?
пт, 20 марта 2020 г. в 15:32, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <bro...@redhat.com>: > On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:05:58 +0300 > Alexander Petrovsky <askju...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > This micro ipvsadm patch fixes wrong (negative) FWMARK values > > representation: > > > > # ipvsadm -L -f 2882430849 > > Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags > > -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn > > FWM -1412536447 wlc > > -> abc.my.host.net. Tunnel 1 0 0 > > > > Hi Alexander, > > Your patch submission does not follow all the procedures, but given > this is fairly trivial, and Julian didn't object, I went ahead and > applied the patch with (your SoB and credit to you), here: > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/kernel/ipvsadm/ipvsadm.git/commit/?id=e61c8cdd1dcad > > -- > Best regards, > Jesper Dangaard Brouer > MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer > > -- Alexander Petrovsky _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org Send requests to lvs-users-requ...@linuxvirtualserver.org or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
