Christiaan Simons: > The contributed IGMP + Altera code won't work out of the box for the raw > API + NO_SYS case.
Okay. I'll try to make the modification against the official release version 1.1.0. > There are a few assumptions on having a sys_arch > ( sys_timeout() in igmp.c and etharp.c ), > therefore it isn't entirely "in the spirit of LWIP". Do you have any advice to implement a timeout handler? > Also I miss some return value checks on mem_malloc(). Could you point out to me the various issues you noticed. > It would be nice if these issues are solved first. I'll try to do my best. > >From my perspective "the spirit of LWIP" is: > > * Raw-API first, additional layers and API's can be > nice but should not collide or invade in the basic API. > * Robust, portable code. Except the issues you noticed, what it's your feeling about the implementation of IGMP/Multicast layer I propose, in term of integration in LWIP? What do you mean by additional layers? Because I don't see what could be qualify as "additional layers" in the code I propose. Gaël _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
