> Both options can be possible. You can dedicate each connection a task, > or use one task for all.
Then i prefer a own task for each connection(port). > I see that FreeRTOS STR912 port > uses uIP(not LWiP). This may cause some problems > because you have to provide your sys_arch implementation in this case. Which lwIP files must be ported for the STR912 system? For the STR912 i have got a complete ethernet library from ST. > I used only LWiP raw and netconn_api layers. Isn't the socket-API easier to use? Just listen, bind and accept in each Task!? Or must i use semaphores too? Are there any restrictions if i use lwIP-socket functions? > I'm succesfully binding 2 ports and using connections at the same time,I > think you can do more easily. You used semaphores to make lwIP threadsafe? Right? Regards Marcel _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
