On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 06:04 -0600, Taranowski, Thomas (SWCOE) wrote: > I think we should remove the parameters if they're not needed, even if > it breaks current ports. We've already sort of passed the > break-the-port barrier with the lwip_socket_init, which requires user > apps to change. > > Having unused arguments and return value feels too much like legacy code > for my comfort. New folks looking to port the source will likely waste > time trying to figure out what the heck the unused arguments are for. > Furthermore, the confusion deepens when going to google to look for > implementation hints, and finding older ports that actually use the > values.
Don't forget that the majority of ports are going to be archived soon as there are no maintainers for them. Kieran _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
