Update of bug #3034 (project lwip):

                  Status:                    None => Fixed                  
             Open/Closed:                    Open => Closed                 

    _______________________________________________________

Follow-up Comment #2:

I think that PBUF_REF was probable not implemented at the time of Marc
Wells's email, and it happened as a result.  Certainly sounds like his
PBUF_EXT type is very similar to PBUF_REF.  I'm happy to close this as done
already, but please reopen if others disagree.

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?3034>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/



_______________________________________________
lwip-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-devel

Reply via email to