Kieran, if the sample is only based on BSD or RAW api, I think it can be add in "contrib/apps". I think these samples have to be done in the same skeleton than "chargen" sample. I think that some tools like a "ping" or a "dns client", or the "http server" could be useful to most of developers. Perhaps just have a subdir for raw api samples, and another one for BSD samples? They can also be a reference for tests or performance measures? ==================================== Frédéric BERNON HYMATOM SA Chef de projet informatique Microsoft Certified Professional Tél. : +33 (0)4-67-87-61-10 Fax. : +33 (0)4-67-70-85-44 Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Site : http://www.hymatom.fr ==================================== P Avant d'imprimer, penser à l'environnement
-----Message d'origine----- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Andrew Lentvorski Envoyé : mercredi 11 avril 2007 23:37 À : Mailing list for lwIP users Objet : Re: [lwip-users] BSD API tcp echo server port Kieran Mansley wrote: > On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 03:16 -0700, Andrew Lentvorski wrote: >> If someone wants to take a look at this (and hopefully incorporate it >> into the ports tree), let me know what procedure I should follow. > > Is this something you'd be willing to maintain on an ongoing basis? Probably not given the current organization of the lwip code. I've gotten spoiled by scons (build system) and mercurial (distributed version control system). They let me maintain "upstreams" of projects fairly easily so that I can incorporate new patches from the original code with far less pain. In addition, I can maintain a mercurial repository alongside the main lwip code even if you don't want it as an official part of lwip. I can't do those things as easily with make and CVS/SVN. When I have to work with make and CVS/SVN, it feels ... primitive. Is there a Wiki or something that I could put a repository or zip/tar file on? It seems a shame to just let this fade into the ether since there are zero BSD examples. > I'm operating a "no code in the ports tree unless it has an active > maintainer" policy at the moment. I may live to regret this, but hope > to archive anything that doesn't have an active maintainer before the > next release. I can understand that. Time is always the most valuable. It's disappointing that none of the vendors using lwip have contributed any documentation back in return. Even the broken ports are better documentation than nothing. Rather than archiving and removing them, what about moving them to a "broken" subdirectory. -a _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:2.1 N:BERNON;Frédéric;;M. FN:Frédéric BERNON ORG:HYMATOM SA;Recherche et Développement TITLE:Chef de projet informatique TEL;WORK;VOICE:04-67-87-61-10 TEL;WORK;FAX:04-67-70-85-44 ADR;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:;23;Zone Industrielle=0D=0A175 rue de Massacan;VENDARGUES;;34740;FRANCE; LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:23=0D=0AZone Industrielle=0D=0A175 rue de Massacan=0D=0AVENDARGUES 34740=0D= =0AFrance URL;WORK:http://www.hymatom.fr ROLE:Chef de projet informatique EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] REV:20020404T083210Z END:VCARD
_______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
