http://www.embedded.com/shared/printableArticle.jhtml?articleID=199202775 I you want to read it... ==================================== Frédéric BERNON HYMATOM SA Chef de projet informatique Microsoft Certified Professional Tél. : +33 (0)4-67-87-61-10 Fax. : +33 (0)4-67-70-85-44 Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Site : http://www.hymatom.fr <http://www.hymatom.fr/> ==================================== P Avant d'imprimer, penser à l'environnement
-----Message d'origine-----
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de
Pettinato, Jim
Envoyé : lundi 14 mai 2007 21:08
À : Goldschmidt Simon; Mailing list for lwIP users
Objet : [lwip-users] lwIP reference in Embedded Systems Design
magazine(previously DHCP - getting address works but not responding)
Actually, the author used the word 'advanced' ('sophisticated' was my
paraphrasing) - and my interpretation was that he was referring to throughput,
primarily - specifically referencing zero-copy and checksum bypass features...
Hasn't that very topic come up recently with regard to lwIP?? ;-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Goldschmidt Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 2:48 PM
To: Pettinato, Jim; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AW: [lwip-users] DHCP - getting address works but not
responding
Cool! I'd like to see an independent comparision of lwIP vs. a
more "sophisticated" stack, though!
As I am not a native speaker, what exactly do you think they
meant with 'sophisticated'? I think we also have some clever ideas in our stack
;-) OK, we might have to work a little to get it fast and real stable. And I'm
biased, too (of course)...
-----Originalnachricht-----
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Mailing list for lwIP users
Gesendet: 14.05.2007 19:24
Betreff: RE: [lwip-users] DHCP - getting address works but not
responding
All,
For those that might be interested, the cover feature of this
month's
Embedded Systems Design magazine ("Put a Configurable 32-bit
Processor
in Your FPGA", N. Sundaramoothy, E.S.D. May 2007) mentions lwIP
as the
sole example of a stack for use with a 'lite' Ethernet
subsystem in the
titular application.
Unfortunately, the author recommends a more sophisticated stack
if a
higher throughput is required... personally I think lwIP could
still fit
the bill, but hey, I might be biased. ;)
Congrats and thanks again to everyone who has contributed and
supported
the lwIP project - it's good to see acknowlegement in an
accepted
industry publication such as E.S.D.!
- Jim
_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
<<image001.jpg>>
<<image002.jpg>>
BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:2.1 N:BERNON;Frédéric;;M. FN:Frédéric BERNON ORG:HYMATOM SA;Recherche et Développement TITLE:Chef de projet informatique TEL;WORK;VOICE:04-67-87-61-10 TEL;WORK;FAX:04-67-70-85-44 ADR;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:;23;Zone Industrielle=0D=0A175 rue de Massacan;VENDARGUES;;34740;FRANCE; LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:23=0D=0AZone Industrielle=0D=0A175 rue de Massacan=0D=0AVENDARGUES 34740=0D= =0AFrance URL;WORK:http://www.hymatom.fr ROLE:Chef de projet informatique EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] REV:20020404T083210Z END:VCARD
_______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
