> So, this means that lwip needs counting semaphores? If so Yes!
> than I can use the semaphores of my OS (which are counting > semaphores) but than I have still the problem of a lot of > sys_sem_signal calls to a semaphore where is never called a > wait for. So the semaphores value is incremented and > incremented and incremented until it reaches a maximum value > (which I can define in my OS) and then the OS reports the > error. I can set the maximum to a very high value but that > doesn't solve the problem. That's an error. I suppose something with your port, an initialization fault presumably... > > Another question is: What does the count argument of > sys_sem_new mean? Is it the initial count value of the > semaphore? Or anything else? Exactly, it's the initial count. Simon _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
