On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 10:27 +0200, Juri Haberland wrote: > Kieran Mansley wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 10:11 +0200, Juri Haberland wrote: > > > >> Preparing the pcb for sending might be better done with udp_connect() > >> and udp_disconnect() I suppose, but I haven't tried it yet - see my > >> example. > > > > I would certainly recommend not accessing the PCB directly if only > > because these fields aren't part of the API and the internal details > > might change. > > Right, so udp_connect() would be the correct way? Just to get a > confirmation...
Yes, I think so. Thanks for the example by the way. Kieran _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
