Frédéric BERNON wrote:
I'm agree with Jonathan & Simon (but I think we should add $date$ and $revision$ CVS keyword, is there any objections to add them ?).
I still think any CVS generated data complicates diffs in my experience, and people should know where their present sources come from - either from "cvs status" or the tarball release. Revisions are only relevant if you use CVS anyway :). But if someone else thinks they'd be useful, then that's fine, add them - people have different preferences.
If you are going to add them then may I recommend $Id$ instead? Jifl -- eCosCentric Limited http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos experts Barnwell House, Barnwell Drive, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 1223 245571 Registered in England and Wales: Reg No 4422071. ------["The best things in life aren't things."]------ Opinions==mine _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
