I tried out the patch yesterday, and it worked fine. Ship it ! On Nov 10, 2007 8:52 PM, Thomas Taranowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sweet, that was fast! I'll test it out. Thanks also for the fixes you > put into the fragmentation code. I rolled that into a release, along with > the rest of the CVS head last week, and it's been very stable for the > customer, and has solved some longstanding instability problems I've > encountered when the stack is being stressed. > > > On Nov 10, 2007 9:48 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Thomas Taranowski schrieb: > > > I'm able to readily reproduce the following, and am wondering if other > > > folks have seen similar behavior, or if it's just a problem with my > > port. > > Are you still? ;-) > > > > I just fixed this bug in CVS. It should now drop packets when they must > > be queued but the corresponding memp pool is empty. > > > > Simon > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lwip-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users > > > > > > -- > Thomas Taranowski > Expert embedded software design/contracting > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (remove the n0sp4m) > -- Thomas Taranowski Expert embedded software design/contracting [EMAIL PROTECTED] (remove the n0sp4m)
_______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
