> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Kieran Mansley > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 6:49 AM > To: Mailing list for lwIP users > Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Dropping existing TCP connections to service new > ones > > On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 11:03 -0800, Art R. wrote: > > Is this a bug? Should the code read "if (pcb->prio < prio && ..." (less > > than instead of less or equal)? > > Sounds to me like that would be more sensible, but I've not looked into > it in any detail. Feel free to file a bug if you'd like this changed.
This would break existing programs that use TCP_MAX_PRIO, since these would be killed in current lwIP versions but won't be in future versions with this < instead of <= change. Maybe we want: #define TCP_NO_KILL_PRIO (TCP_MAX_PRIO+1) And recommend using TCP_NO_KILL_PRIO for pcbs that cannot be killed due to inactivity. Bill _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
