Bill Auerbach wrote: >> You can call tcp_output directly yourself, or you can call >> tcp_output_nagle >> to use the Nagle algorithm, which is usually recommended for a variety of >> reasons. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nagle's_algorithm > > Thank you. That was a good read. As is Nagle's follow-up about delayed > ACKs and Nagle's algorithm not playing well together and his solution: > > http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=174457&threshold=1&commentsor > t=0&mode=thread&cid=14515105 > > Does lwIP use or support this delayed ACK "improvement"?
Nope. Whether the extra code complexity (=> size increase) will mean it ever happens I'm not sure. Jifl -- eCosCentric Limited http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos experts Barnwell House, Barnwell Drive, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 1223 245571 Registered in England and Wales: Reg No 4422071. ------["Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere"]------ Opinions==mine _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
