bill wrote:
Does setting this serve any purpose in raw mode since TF_NODELAY is
used only in sockets.c?
Yes, it's also used in tcp_output_do_nagle() in tcp.h
Ahh, yes. My bad - thanks. In raw mode, is there any benefit to setting
this versus what I'm currently doing - calling tcp_write followed by
tcp_output. In fact, I guess I should ask is there any possible problems in
doing what I do? Should I set TF_NODELAY and not call tcp_output? Do both?
Do only tcp_output? We do send small packets, they have to be sent
immediately.
Doing it yourself should also work, but TF_NODELAY would be the proper
solution, I guess, also regarding future compatibility.
Simon
_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
