Hey guys,
[email protected] wrote on 30.01.2009
02:53:21:
> But I think the original pointer is interested in more complicated
> routing, possibly even dynamic routing. I think that would require a
fair
> bit of new code in lwIP.
I think the project shouldn't get carried away from it's original idea.
And that is _embedded_ _devices_.
The first one meaning we talk about minimal ressources and optimal usage
of them.
The second point is, LwIP is aimed at devices. It's not gonna be a complex
router, shooting millions of packets a sec. (Thats what you buy the
expensive Ciscos or Junipers for)
Thats just not what it is intended for and all code that would be added in
that direction will bind developers to stuff that does not hit the target
audience.
just my humble opinion though.
regards,
Fabian
_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
