Ok thanks, this helps

Francois
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: bill 
  To: 'Mailing list for lwIP users' 
  Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 10:40 AM
  Subject: RE: [lwip-users] Hello to mailinglist


  In a nutshell, data going to and from the application is stored in memory 
(either RAM or Flash).  When the packet driver sends a packet, it sends the 
payload part of the data from the same memory that the application provided to 
be sent.  When the packet driver receives data, the payload is passed to the 
application in the same memory that it came in to from the MAC.  There can be 
significant improvement of program performance by not copying, especially when 
sending or receiving lots of data. This is true from both ends of the spectrum 
- low speed processors which take a lot of time to simply copy memory and very 
high speed processors where a memory copy is slow because of the relatively 
slow speed of memory and not because the speed of the processor.

   

  Bill

   

  From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Francois Bouchard
  Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 10:16 AM
  To: Mailing list for lwIP users
  Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Hello to mailinglist

   

  What exactly is zero-copy rx/tx?

    ----- Original Message ----- 

    From: Piero 74 

    To: Mailing list for lwIP users 

    Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 9:52 AM

    Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Hello to mailinglist

     

     

       

      I suppose I can post it as a patch on savannah. I forgot, I also
      developed a driver for the on-chip FEC+PHY of FreeScale's MCF5223x. It
      does zero-copy receive. I'll post it as well,


    please notify me after post... i want to see your implementation for 
zero-copy
    as you know we had some discussions in mailing list regarding zero-copy rx 
and also zero-copy tx 


     

      But filtering IP
      addresses and ports in the driver would be straightforward, wouldn't
      it? Just match the appropriate fields from IP header against the
      whitelist.


    yes, i know... i also suppose is simple...
    but i wanted to know if other people has developed a similar feature...
    i know that is not a robust protection against hacking attack, but it could 
mitagate them,
    and it could be an interesting feature for the marketing (just label on the 
box: "built-in firewall")
     
    thanks for your reply
    bye
    Piero

     


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    _______________________________________________
    lwip-users mailing list
    [email protected]
    http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  lwip-users mailing list
  [email protected]
  http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

Reply via email to