On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 10:15 -0500, Chen wrote: > Just read Simon's comment,PBUF_POOL_SIZE is for rx only (not tx as > suggested by Kieran).
Simon is right I think, and I apologise for the confusion. > My guess is by making PBUF_POOL_SIZE 60, with PBUF_POOL_BUFSIZE at > 500, we are allocating 30000 bytes for rx, plus the tx buffer of > 30000, we may have some memory issue (instead of lwip bug) here That makes a lot of sense. Kieran _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
