On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Ken Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> And, after looking at the patch, I agree that applying it forward
> would get me what I already have.  The date for this patch is May 2008
> which is after the 1.3.0 release of lwip in March that year.  Do I
> need to apply this patch in reverse to get this bugfix?

Sorry for the noise.  It appears that I have a version of lwip that is
between 1.3.0 and the present CVS head and it happens to include this
patch.

   Ken


_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

Reply via email to