2009/6/29 Kieran Mansley <[email protected]> > On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 15:41 +0200, patrick Deflandre wrote: >
> > None of the packet are compliant with the tftp protocol. This will > > surely make wireshark in trouble when checking an expected checksum... > > No: the UDP checksum is independent of the next protocol layer, and so > won't care if the TFTP bit is correct or not. I was wrong, Thank for the precision. > > I notice that in the udp_echo.trace.txt there is the following: > > <LF>find_entry: selecting empty entry 1 > <LF>etharp_request: sending ARP request.etharp_raw: sending raw ARP > packet.etharp_query: queued packet 215bf0 on ARP entry 1 > > This is odd for two reasons: (i) it should already have an entry for the > PC's MAC address as it's updated that entry lots already from the other > ARP requests seen on the network earlier; and (ii) the packet it sends > is not an ARP request for the PC's MAC, but a gratuitous ARP of its own > MAC. I think there is definitely something going wrong here. > > Do you have ARP_QUEUEING on? > Yes, I have ARP_QUEUEING on. But I did not bother until now. Is this good or not ? Should I change this value ?
_______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
