>>Are these really critical bugs? No. I think is may not the critical bug, but GPRS Access server related problem. >>They sound more like feature requests or changes in behaviour to me, These are some AS compatible problem. The problem is just bother me days to find and solve. I just hope others won't take time to solve such kind of problem.
The changed codes are no harmful for normal flow, only for some kind of GPRS AS. >>You're welcome to file bug reports for them though, and there's then a chance they'll be included in the next release. Sure. LwIP is one of the success projects. I hope it becomes better. On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Kieran Mansley <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 15:17 +0800, yueyue papa wrote: > > This is my ipcp.c > > > > 1. If DNS negotiate did not repsonse DNS information, the PPP goes on, > > do not regard as failure. > > 2. If local IP address is unable to get from Access sever, > > I use 10.0.0.1 as the default address. > > > > Is it possible to added to the formal version? > > Are these really critical bugs? They sound more like feature requests > or changes in behaviour to me, so I would not normally include them in a > final release at this stage. > > You're welcome to file bug reports for them though, and there's then a > chance they'll be included in the next release. > > Kieran > > > > _______________________________________________ > lwip-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users >
_______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
