Should we create a new pool for SNMP response and trap? Alex
----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Goldschmidt" <[email protected]> To: "Mailing list for lwIP users" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 1:23 AM Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Relationship between lwIP options > > > If you say PBUF pool is only for incoming packet, then lwip SNMP driver is > > in Fault. > > I know, there's some 'room for improvement' in the snmp code... In any case it's a bad example and the pbuf pool really should only be used for incoming packets right now. > > The reason is that *if* outgoing packets would empty the pbuf pool, there would be no pbufs left for incoming packets and the stack might stall (e.g. incoming packets would be needed to free outgoing TCP packet that are queued for ACK). > > Simon > -- > GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! > Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01 > > > _______________________________________________ > lwip-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users > _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
