Fabian Koch wrote:
1) Is the mbox implementation supposed to accept NULL as a message?
Yes, it is!
Which change? The change in the order of calls? That was to prevent calling the callback if the mbox didn't accept the message, and it was a bug.2) Is the change only for correcting the statistics?
Simon _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
